This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of altered states of consciousness on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Altered States of ConsciousnessWikipedia:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessTemplate:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessAltered States of Consciousness
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Until one is supplied, and not removed, I put the original image back -- which again, has permission from the artist to use on Wikipedia. Please do not leave this article without an image! --Thoric (talk) 21:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Psychedelic artists section is too contentious to leave almost completely unreferenced. I suggest we remove all those without references supporting a statement that the person makes psychedelic art. Ideally if the artist's article has a reference it should be included here. - Shiftchange (talk) 00:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually no. Anybody can challenge any un-sourced claim, remove it and ask for a citation from a reliable source. You don't build an encyclopedia by hoping statements are true. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say you couldn't challenge it. I'm saying that it would be far more helpful to add the citations you so desire rather than delete content pending someone else adding said citations. Also, WP:Verifiability states that, "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". So if you have a specific name on that list you are challenging, feel free, but you shouldn't just blanket challenge the entire list as a whole. I do not feel that the list of psychedelic artists is considered to be material that is "likely to be challenged". --Thoric (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Having a long list within an article is not great style. This could either be a separate list, or there could be a category Psychedelic Artists that would allow people to access a dynamic list. Presumably in each article there would be sufficient referencing to support the claim. (I favor the latter approach.) LaMona (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I removed it, and replaced it by a more appropriate image. It was probably added by the user who created the image.Teknad (talk) 10:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted some clarity and context around the statement "Underground Comix were ribald, intensely satirical, and seemed to pursue weirdness for the sake of weirdness." Without context and citation for this, I find "weird" to be suggesting of biased language. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maisonmartin (talk • contribs) 17:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]